Can Someone Help Me With My Stoichiometry Problems In Chemistry?
May 12th, 2009
I put all my questions into an image file. Thanks to whoever helps me! I tried all of these questions, but I am getting the wrong answers. Please help mehttp://img171.imageshack.us/img171/1742/…
Entry Filed under: Stoichiometry




























4 Comments Add your own
1. coza b | May 12th, 2009 at 10:58 pm
8.
All water evaporated = water loss = 11.88 - 7.6 = 4.28 g.
moles of water = 4.28/18 = 0.2378 moles
13.
Molecular weight
CaF2=78
HF=20
source: http://www.uwosh.edu/faculty_staff/kedro...
percent yield = actual yield/theoretical yield
theoretical yield = 2x(9/78)moles = 0.2308 (based on coefficients, 1 mole of CaF2 produce 2 moles of HF)
actual yield = (1.76/20)moles = 0.088
percent yield = 0.088/0.2308 = 38.12%
16.
Atomic weight of Fe = 56
mol weight of Fe2O3 = 160
4Fe + 3O2 –> 2Fe2O3
Fe stays as Fe = 7/8×627 = 548.625
Fe become Fe2O3 = 1/8×627 = 78.375 ==> 78.375/56 = 1.4 moles,
Fe2O3 = 2/4 x 1.4 moles x 160 = 112 g
total wt = 112+548.625= 660.625 g
17.
assume all glucose become energy+water+Co2
(mol wt=180)
C6H12O6 + 6O2 –> 6CO2 + 6H2O
300 g/day
total CO2 = 6 x (300/180) moles/day x 365 days/year x 6 billion x 44 g/mole CO2
= 9.636 x 10^14 g/year
23.
Mr Fe2O3 = 160 g/mole
1000 kg Fe = 1000/56 kmoles
Fe2O3 needed = 1/2 x 1000/56 = 1000/112 kmoles
Fe2O3 needed = 1000/112 x 160 = 1428.57 kg
purity = 1428.57/2250 = 63.492%
2. Dani | May 12th, 2009 at 10:58 pm
sorry, you should go talk to your teacher BEFORE school not before or after class or during either you lose brownie points for that you gain for before school
3. neonpony | May 12th, 2009 at 10:58 pm
i would like to help you but i cant see the questions
4. ME2010 | May 12th, 2009 at 10:58 pm
I need some help with that stuff as well. I can do some stoichiometry, and from my understanding it’s basically converting the grams you want to moles, then multiplying that by the ratio, then multiplying it back to grams.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed